Issue #213
9 Nov 2020
The challenge of accuracy / relevancy isn’t ever going to go away until we have find a non-textual way to describe work human beings do. So members have been hammering this tool in the fb group, but I give LinkedIn all the credit for trying πŸ‘ with the data they have. Think about time-over-tasks and you might be able to quantify human work rather than interpret it. A conversation for another time πŸ˜‰. H/T brainfooder Marcel van der Meer for the share of this tool though, which I still think, is pretty cool.